Module · Compliance Enablers

SecureDevelopment

A.8.25–A.8.33, Engineered Into the Pipeline

The secure development lifecycle controls of ISO 27001 — secure design, secure coding, code review, testing, and the rest of A.8.25 through A.8.33 — managed as a living control catalog rather than a policy PDF engineering never reads. Define controls by practice area from threat modeling to penetration testing, mark which gates are mandatory and blocking, track automation coverage, and manage findings. This is where an ISMS meets the build pipeline.

Before → After

The problem we solve.

Why teams switch to Compliance Enablers for secure development.

Industry challenges

  • Secure SDLC exists as a policy document with no connection to what pipelines actually enforce
  • Nobody can say which security gates are mandatory, which are blocking, and which are aspirational
  • Findings from SAST, DAST, and pen tests live in separate tool consoles with no unified remediation view
  • A.8.25–A.8.33 audit questions trigger a scramble across engineering documentation

How we solve it

  • A control catalog organized by practice area, from threat modeling to penetration testing
  • Explicit required and blocking flags map policy to pipeline enforcement
  • Automation classification exposes the manual gaps in the lifecycle
  • Findings tracked against controls give one remediation picture across tools
Capabilities

Built for depth,
out of the box.

Every capability is production-ready on day one. No add-ons, no extra subscriptions.

Flagship capability

SDLC Control Catalog by Practice Area

Organize controls across the secure development practice areas: threat modeling, secure design, secure coding, code review, static analysis, dynamic analysis, dependency management, and penetration testing.

Required & Blocking Gates

Mark controls as mandatory and as blocking — for example, a SAST gate on pull requests — so policy intent maps to enforceable pipeline behavior.

Automation Coverage Tracking

Classify each control as fully automated, partially automated, or manual, exposing exactly where secure development still depends on someone remembering.

Findings Management

Track open findings from secure development activities against the controls that produced them, keeping remediation visible rather than lost in tool consoles.

Audit-Ready SDLC Evidence

A structured answer to the A.8.25–A.8.33 questions every ISO auditor and enterprise customer asks about how software is built securely.

The impact

Why it matters.

Demonstrate a defined, enforced secure development lifecycle — not just a secure coding policy
Blocking-gate visibility shows which protections actually stop insecure code shipping
Automation tracking targets the manual steps most likely to be skipped under deadline pressure
One view answers customer security questionnaires about SDLC practices
Unified data model

Part of a connected whole.

Secure Development shares a unified data model with every other module. Zero silos, by design.

14-day free trial · no card required

See Secure Development
in action.

Book a 30-minute demo and we'll walk you through secure development tailored to your team, frameworks, and priorities.